Tuesday, November 13, 2007
Fred Thompson Uber Alles
Poor Fred Thompson. He has the presidency of the United States wrapped up if only (A) he can get the Republican nomination and (B) Hillary Clinton fails to get the Democratic nomination.
Thompson is a literal giant among presidential candidates. He stands almost six foot six inches in height. Were he running against any of the male Democrats so far boring the world, Thompson would win easily under the workings of de Yonge’s Law of Hair and Height.
That law states–please note the subtle wording–that the candidate who seems the taller will win. None of the men Democrats even come close to Thompson in towering, physically, that is. Thompson not only seems taller; he is taller and will look so on television, where tallness counts when it comes to setting off instinctive responses among the voters.
The matter of the candidate appearing the tallest winning the presidential election remains untested, however, if Hillary Clinton receives the Democratic nod and becomes the first woman to run for the presidency as a major-party candidate.
If a Clinton-Thompson contest occurs, the scientists among us will tease the results to yield many, many papers of deep sociology to publish in such learned journals as The National Review and The Nation about whether de Yonge’s Law also applies to females.
Thompson, of course, while interesting to talk about theory, is unlikely to be the Republican candidate simply because he also appears to be incompetent, as a campaigner and as a thinker.
Chaos stirred by his wife characterizes his political campaign. Aside from a few gags that awaken the reporters condemned to covering the now-endless presidential campaign purgatory, Thompson has contributed zero to the so-called debate with other Republican worthies. If there is a bad idea, Thompson has embraced it with gusto, but that hardly distinguishes him from Rudy Giuliani and the rest.
Whoever other than Thompson the Republicans manage to fish out of the lake of banalities central to their mindset, if that person runs against Clinton, an interesting test will otherwise occur of de Yonge’s Law.
The second half of the law states that if two presidential candidates appear to be equally tall, then the candidate that seems to have the most hair will win.
Having a woman in the race with a considerable head of hair not only is a new thing but genetically might bestow upon women candidates over time, whenever matters of height are more or less equal, a leg up in winning, since many male candidates–John McCain, for instance–cannot compete in hirsuteness. Balding is a curse in presidential politics.
In that respect, the law does not discount for wearing a toupee or a wig, since appearing to have the most hair is what matters deep within the brains of the electorate, responding as they are to an evolutionary device, no doubt selected during millions of years of fighting with cave bears and tigers, that regards height first and hair second as signs of the savior. (Can you imagine a bald Jesus creating a religion?)
If Mrs. Clinton fails to get the nomination, then whoever wins out of the mob of lackluster Democratic male candidates will compete with one of the Republican con men. De Yonge’s law will function in its full scientific glory, and millions of Americans will make their ordinary enlightened choice based on unconscious feelings.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Yes but Barack is tall AND has a full head of hair. Thomspson won't get the R nomination, of course, because the rule of "must have something intelligent to say" can trump the de Yonge hair/head rule.
And applying de Yonges law of hair and height, why risk it all on Hillary? The only logical choice is Obama.
It is easy to see how these rules might become self serving.
Dear Jack,
I am so glad to see you have a blog up and running. I am Al's daughter, and have heard so much about you through the years. On occasion I have even been entertained by your clever exchanges with my Dad, and now I get to read you directly.
I think you state a very good argument for the future presidential race with de Yonge's Law of Hair and Height up to the point of the toupee. I suspect this is a case of double standard, but hear me out. I know that I, for one, can spot a rug from miles away. I think most women can. I am not sure about men, but because it is your law, I will assume you have researched this. Of course this is a new phenomenon, unless tigers and bears had vanity/insecurity issues. Rather than responding with primal fear and intimidation from hair height, women respond with primal disgust. And of course, we make up half of the electorate. Toupees not only cancel votes, but according to my theory--Towers' Law of Bad Rugs, balding candidates who do NOT wear them, actually score extra points. (This means Guiliani and McCain cancel out Mitt Romney. Romney further loses points for hair dyeing.) Hair plugs that create a connect-the-dot effect also cancel votes at least until the full crop comes in according to my Law.
I certainly look forward to your "column" for this next, very interesting, political year.
Lisa
Post a Comment